I use a “marker” 2 second audio file to help me visually separate tracks in groupings of 4-6 tracks in some of my performance playlists. I have no issues doing that in Rekordbox, but Engine DJ doesn’t seem to allow it. Is there a setting somewhere?
Alternatively, anyone in this community has a workaround to help breakdown a playlist into mini-sets?
Why are features like this simple not just built in?! I already came to the same conclusion, but I shoulldn’t have to do it by creating new audio and labeling it as a marker track. Just add it as a feature… we want dividers between tracks to group them for easier visibility
I have a similar issue, phps it’S that what here is described (my English may be insufficient):
The summary may be as follows:
The quantity of the “Hot Cues” is insufficient.
E.G. Amant “If there is love”. I amended the beatgrid manually; a lot of work
Now I need more than 8 Hot Cues, and so I want to duplicate the track (as workaround), so that I can install again eight different hot cues and mix “If there is love” with itself.
In track 1 are set eight Hot Cues in the beginning, track 2 in the middle and track 3 in the end and so on.
Problem: But unfortunately I didn’t find any way, to make a duplicate of itself after amending the beatgrid .
I tried to copy, making a new playlist, renaming and so on, but it is always the same, and if I amend one of the tracks, it will sync the others. But this effect I don’t want at this procedure.
I worked with different USB sticks, copies …
Any assistance in this matter will be highly appreciated and many thanks in advance.
That’s a new one - or at least incredibly niche , much in the same way that Stu-c mentions correctly about this “same track multiple times in one playlist”
It’s great that different people use gear in wierd and wonderful, in some cases; unique, ways - but it’s not a fault when the potatoe peeler won’t make cappuccinos , just such a niche requirement that it’s not catered for, and unlikely to win many votes in a firmware feature request (but hey, why not try it and see what happens, both)
8 sounds like a lot to me, I usually just have a couple on mine, the start of the track and the first beat (if it’s not the start). Maybe a feature request for some advanced labelling of tracks is what is needed here? So the hot cues can be left to do their job.
I just try it out. Same result as before. I am not proficient to duplicate the same track twice in a playlist. If I rename the track into Marker#1, Marker#2 … the track will be renamed in all playlists even in the collection.
Or what is the meaning of "
If you make a copy of the track on the Windows enviroment, you don’t transport Hot Cues or loops.
Do we phps talk of different issues?
Im really keen on learning more and so many thanks in advance
So I was suggesting the OP create a range of blank tracks called ‘marker 1’ ‘marker 2’ etc so they can be added to a playlist in between other tracks they want to separate.
if i’m right, you advise to create different playlists
? with the name marker 1, marker 2, etc?
If I act in this way, I can insert a track, but (and this is imo the problem) if I modify the track in one of the playlists, the track in all other playlists even in the collection will be altered simultaneously.
Has anybody counted the amount of workarounds needed to get this software anywhere near the level of other DJ databases? I see a lot of people complaining about usability and functionality and just as many “workarounds” in answer to their inquiry. Denon should just search this site for the term workaround and then build a list of fixes for the next “upgrade” to their database software.