Ill let you have a read of the guide kindly provided by Reese and see if you can do it.
As he said, if you dont follow the template, nobody will be able to vote on it.
I’ve been asking for this kind of customization for years.
Part of this one? Still hasn’t got much momentum:
I believe that if you cannot answer my question (which I asked correctly and to the point), then you shouldn’t be writing to me. Not to mention your ridiculous attempt (such as: ‘you need to tone down,’ ‘to work for you’) to turn the conversation into an emotional flood.
There is a significant difference between blocking “SYNC” and disabling its display for a competition (possibly including BPM display) and separately turning off the “Sync indicator” function while still displaying BPM and not blocking the “SYNC” function
Thank you very much, you are very kind, but I do not want to just read the user agreement. Now I want to be directed to where exactly in the user agreement the procedure for “submitting a request in the forum” is specified, to ensure that my rights are not being violated, nothing more. And as you can see, I am being quite respectful in my public request
I think you’re making a bigger deal out of this than you need to… just fill the feature request out and people can vote on it.
I would be infinitely grateful if it were possible to remove the display of the “Sync indicator” )) But I am sure that your idea about “beast” mode will surely delight a large number of users, that’s very cool!
Have you tried modifying the QML to make this possible in your dev environment? I imagine it’s pretty trivial, no?
I ask because it would give the 6000M users closer to vinyl emulation, except when we have vinyl, we tend to look at the grooves and the closest thing we have to that in these digital decks is the mini waveform display.
And yet, formalism should not be more important than new ideas and feedback. Moreover, even if you have a “request form,” it does not affect the overload of the forum with old but active requests that go on indefinitely. My advice: allow people to freely write their suggestions (without request forms and questions), but limit their requests with timeframes (e.g., 3 months). If a suggestion/idea does not reach the minimum threshold of votes, it should be archived. This approach will simplify the work for moderators and also improve feedback on key and most popular requests
P.S. And of course, this does not mean that developers will not review archived requests for potential implementation! We are simply talking about a more efficient way to manage the forum with regards to current requests and suggestions
Hi Vladimir, whenever a community (and even companies) grow to a certain point “freehand” suggestions are unmanageable, and end up costing tons in time (and coin) to manage. So, they end up developing processes to streamline these types of suggestions.
You are free to write suggestions however you want, but they go against the process that has been set forth by the creators & managers of this community forum.
That said, what large community forums have you built and managed? I’m asking because this all seems to be more about your feelings being hurt or your dislike for the process that this community has than there being a process that the community follows & enforces.
In my field of work, I focus on information optimization, so I believe I can offer advice in this context (whether to listen to it or not is another matter 
). As for emotions, I am an open person and do not hide it, but I always write within the bounds of decency
In other words, you want to say that the user agreement does not have specific requirements for the “request form” in the “New/Open Requests” section that differ from the rest of the forum. Did I understand you correctly?
Im saying if you want a feature request, follow the rules of the forum and create one.
in the time its taken you to double down and argue with people about it, you could have just made the request and moved on.
Nothing you say here will change how the forum works, as its a long standing part of the forum for tracking feature requests… take it or leave it, your choice.
Of course, I respect any opinion different from mine 
I don’t have a problem with giving users all those individual options and more they can choose from. We haven’t even mentioned the phase meter, etc. Sometimes I might even want the moving waveform still present if I can both zoom out 2X more and get rid of the beat grid lines when I’m not editing the grid. I think the ability to customize a Beast Mode, activate it, and even lock the unit would be a lovely feature to have. If it’s your gear, obviously no one’s going to force you to turn these elements off.
Dear all,
a few people here need to go out for a longer walk and look at the stars …
Be nice with each other on here!
So between this an the other thread, we are 45 posts in and with no valid feature request.
I have taken the necessary 2 minutes and have written this up: https://community.enginedj.com/t/add-ability-to-disable-the-phase-meter-beat-keeper-sync-indicator/56487/2
@Vladimir_Leonov - please understand that we do have a form for a reason. It is there to keep things clear, simple and fair for users. To be honest - while your requests did not comply with our form, they were well written and thought out.
As it stands we have a 40+ odd posts that doesn’t get us nearer to a solution. ANYONE could have taken the 2 minutes to write this up using the form. I’m closing both related threads. Please continue the conversation in the feature request.
Vote for it there!