Hi, is it possible to configure the second SC6k as a ‘‘layer B’’ (only to view the wave) on the first SC6K (both in singe mode) and viceversa? Thanks
No stacked waveforms across players 
1 Like
Uhm… sad news. We got 4 waves on in a SC LIVE 4 and no way to choose what wave to see on two SC6000 in link? It is a sin. Probably this is THE ONLY reason of the competitor success against Denon
The only player on the market with stacked waveforms is the CDJ3000. I’m not sure this is a huge advantage, looking at players setup on many stages, I don’t see a lot of users using stacked waveforms on CDJ 3000’s. I personally hate it.
1 Like
You look as a Pioneer Sponsor. 
If the SC is able to stack with a 2nd layer it is only a software problem, easily solvable on the Engine. The two device are now well linked in single mode
Nope, I personally don’t like the stacked waveforms, when I play on 3000’s I keep it always disabled. For me it is useless.
1 Like
OK, please, do you know how it is possible to remark this to the coders of the Engine OS about this important implementation?
Despite personal opinions (also dont like it)
There is a feature request about this in the Feature Request forum. If you think you need this feature you can vote for it. If its popular enough InMusic will maybe add it to their roadmap and implement it.
PS: https://community.enginedj.com/t/stacked-waveforms-between-players/36897
1 Like
Thank you Johan
1 Like
I checked that number after I typed the above 
I simulated the sequences and this modification seems simple enough. In SINGLE mode it would be sufficient to load the same wave as the opposite SC, synchronizing the execution speed and a few other parameters via software. In this case the “layer” B would be used as the monitor of the second SC 
This shouldn’t be a very difficult task for coders.