Load screen

General Area
1

You can’t see this.

IMG_20250325_215349
IMG_20250325_2153491920×1446 74.1 KB
Why you can’t change this ■■■■■■■ load screen ■■■■ you programist who thing to change this screen from 3.4 version. ■■■■■■■ programist who do no listening costumers ■■■■ you.

2

Dr. Liquid Ice here with a full month’s prescription of Chill Pill for you.

image
image1600×1600 118 KB

4 Likes
3

Thanks :folded_hands: I can’t understand who make this load screen without information needed to better load track’s. I don’t want to downgrade my SC live 4 to 3,4 version where we see all info about deck’s when we load track. This guy who make this screen can bring back screen from 3,4 version or add more info to deck’s like time of song and then we can see the deck of song with time 00:00 is end and you can load on this deck new track , for now when you play gig on 4 deck’s you must remember the deck where song is end.

ADD MORE INFO TO THIS FUC… SCREEN PLEASEEEEEEEEEEE

THIS IS SO DIFFICULT TO DO TELL ME

I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY YOU DONT DO THIS.

4

And this one https://community.enginedj.com/t/can-you-add-more-info-to-load-deck-screen-please/59540

This is my request :slightly_smiling_face::grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes::slightly_smiling_face::grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes::slightly_smiling_face::slightly_smiling_face::slightly_smiling_face: And nothing happened :sob::sob::pensive_face::sob:

5

Don’t stress yourself too much, there are requests with over 100 likes and years old that are not implemented.

They only serve for developers to borrow ideas and see what can be squeezed in if there are available resources

2 Likes
6

I know this my friend :wink::grin:

The only way is wait patiently :folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands: to bring back load screen from 3.4 version.

wait patiently :folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands::folded_hands:

7

Creating a new topic where you rant about it is not waiting patiently.

2 Likes
8

They will only implement something if it aligns to their product roadmap. These feature requests are a nice place for people to park their “wish list” items, and sometimes they align to their product strategy.

I always try to remember: Their product, their rules, their priorities, their strategy. Full stop.

1 Like
9

I have no problem with that. Issue is there is still no transparency from their side what doesn’t align with their product roadmap.

How many feature request are marked as [Will not implement]? Very few and yet they allow requests with hundreds of votes to languish here for years.

Votes are useless and yet limited to 10, where the f is the logic with that? We all know the game, you need to give an outlet valve to users not to biatch to much on social media and that is the purpose of the forum site.

10

This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.