In the latest releases BPM analysis is JUNK…straight forward JUNK!!! It was much better at 3.0.0. or earlier.
Just another trash from Denon…
AND DON’T JUST DON’T TELL ME I HAVE TO CHANGE BPM RANGE FOR EACH TRACK, JUST DON’T DONT DONT… IT’S 2024!!!
■■■■■■ OFFF, MY LIBRARY IS USELESS!!
1 Like
Can a mod please remove this puerile nonsense?
Thanks.
4 Likes
STU-C
February 6, 2024, 8:53am
3
Exactly. And the account too preferably.
If mods did not ban that french guy who told everybody on the forum to go f themselves I don’t see why would they ban this one, just sayin’
And…he is kinda not wrong in some aspects of BPM analysis of Engine.
Why do we not have a right click- reanalyze-select range option?
STU-C
February 6, 2024, 10:55am
5
Aren’t ‘that’ French guy and this one just the same person on different accounts?
The ranges are annoying but i added some new music to Serato this week and left the range as ‘none’ and the analysis was a bit of a mess, so its better to define the range for accurate reading.
PKtheDJ
February 6, 2024, 10:58am
6
IMO if the analysis tech is done properly, then a ‘none’ setting shouldn’t be a problem.
(see Algoriddim’s Fluid Beatgrid™)
The worst thing about the range in Engine now, is the awkwardness of how it affects the cloud storage of metadata.
1 Like
STU-C
February 6, 2024, 10:59am
7
In my case, i analysed DeRobert and the half truths - 100 yard dash and it set them at half BPM (80ish) rather than recognising it as 160.
system
Closed
February 7, 2024, 4:53pm
8
This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.