Maybe they dont read the full thread, but they will read the last comment.
So if you just made a statement, correcting wrong info and then locked the thread for any more comments, people would have seen that.
I think the fact that your “Introducing the SC6000…”-thread has been up for 15 hours and only have recieved 2 Likes, says alot.
Yes, we shall embrace the future and the evolution is new gear over time. But it would be great if Denon actually would embrace the most needed feature requests, and not just add nice-to-haves… We got bigger issues that being able to Pre-listen a track or not.
Taking a look at the top 20 of most liked features…
115 likes on the Auto-mix function… Sure it’s a nice thing, but we are djs… its not a need-to-have at first.
On screen clock…not a need to have… yet a neat feature….
Ability to Shrink/ Expand Beat Grids (SC5000/M (89 votes)) and Better BPM editing on the Prime 4 (74 votes) = 163 votes (+ another 58 votes on “Tap bpm manually”) 221 votes solely on the BPM issue. And yet you insist to keep working on a algorithm that has been 3-4 years to reach its current state.
This would affect SO many other things, as Loop, Slicer, Beatjump, effects on the mixer etc etc. and it’s a need to have. Launching a new product without having this sorted out, just creates more requests in this direction as well, as new customers come.
I truly understand that some of the feature requests are “WOW, that would be a cool feature, and could be fun to implement”… but what is most needed at this moment?
Finally, let me salute you for the SC6000/M… looks awesome and I´m sure it will bring some new members to the Denon family. And hopefully it will make Pioneer shake in their pants! 