I think you have to be realistic at some point, quality has a cost. And for InMusic to maintain prices 30 to 40% lower than other brands on certain types of products, there is no mystery, arbitrations and compromises must be made somewhere.
And don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying this to denigrate the brand or the quality of the products, even if facing reality will not please a certain number of fanboys on this forum, and yet I am myself a Denon DJ fanboy in a way because I love their products. But that doesn’t stop me from being lucid.
Yes, the products when you look at them like that from the outside give a feeling of robustness and solidity, it seems well finished.
Yes, the chassis and the choice of exterior materials are good in most cases, at least on “prime” products. But clearly, small savings are made on the choice and quality of internal components. The buttons are not of high quality, they are thin and cheap plastic, the holding frames of which break easily (or even the problems of CUE/Play buttons which break, and the view buttons which collapse in certain units).
The faders range from mediocre to average at best, if they were replaceable directly and easily from above, well why not but that is unfortunately not the case.
The rest is, in my opinion, rather decent, the potentiometers are very good, the pitch faders are very good, the screens are decent even if the resolution could be better.
The jogwheels are quite good on the “primes” (I love the feeling of the jogwheel on the prime 2), but are not as good on the sc live 4 of a bar in which I play regularly.
I pretty much agree that InMusic needs to improve the quality of the knobs and faders, the rest is pretty decent for the price you spend.